You might remember the huge kerfuffle last summer about the Associated Press and its plans to charge bloggers on a pay-per-word basis every time a blogger used any content from an AP story in a blog post.
So, for instance, if you grabbed a paragraph of text and pasted it into your blog post – even with full attribution and a link to the original content – you’d have to have an agreement in place with the AP first, never mind fair use and fair dealing practices.
The AP’s stated objectives at the time were to do with things like protecting intellectual property rights.
The cack-handed way they went about it, though, alienated just about the whole blogosphere.
Looks like something even worse is brewing in the UK with moves by the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) to introduce a scale of charges for anyone in the PR business who uses a link on their own website to any mainstream media content elsewhere online.
Come again? They’re going to charge you just for linking?
PR Week reported on this on June 23 but it doesn’t seem to have got anyone’s attention (I missed it). PR Bristol has the details:
The NLA are introducing a new, additional set of charges relating to coverage on the web. This WILL effect us as PRs!!
- We will be charged for not only web coverage we forward or print but even the sending of a URL (web link) to client
- Clients will also be charged for the receipt of the same
- If you forward a link and also print / copy the piece you will be charged twice
- From Sept 09 cuttings agencies will be charged this new fee so it’s likely their charges to us will increase
- From Jan 10 all PR Agencies will be charged as will all clients who are forwarded links
- The newspapers are fully behind these new charges (it is revenue for them)
- It appears this is not a global introduction – just in the UK
This is to do with a new service from the NLA called eClips Web which the NLA describes as:
[…] a reliable, publisher controlled database of website content, which takes feeds directly from publisher content management systems. eClips Web will enable media monitoring companies to offer an improved service to their clients with greater depth of information, permanence and faster delivery.
And there’s a snazzy diagram to explain it:
In his post (which is where I heard about it), Stephen Waddington has some good questions:
[…] When I share the results of Google News search or a RSS aggregator that has pulled in content from national media with colleagues and clients will they need to pay per click?
And what of the future of the Guardian Open Platform? Will its commercial partners now need to pay to republish content?
And what about Twitter? Every time I mention a newspaper story and add my shortcut URL – and I do that a lot – does that count?
If it does, then this idea is a step right back into the dark ages.
Looks like a great topic to see some discussion among the UK PR community. A good start at PR Bristol.
(Dinosaur pic courtesy Raffles Museum news under Creative Commons license.)
[Update July 13] Shel and I discussed this topic in today’s episode of the FIR podcast.
38 responses to “Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs”
This makes interesting reading…
It almost falls back into a situation where your going to charge me for walking down the high street and pointing to a friend at something I like in a shop window.
That sort of idea would never get traction – so how can this?
Why stop there? I propose that newspapers hire teams to patrol public transport each morning and levy on-the-spot fines for anyone reading a story in their paper over the shoulder of the person who actually paid for the paper. Repeat offenders could simply have their eyes poked out. That would teach them to use the papers as a source of news and information!
Good to see old media continually struggling to make sense of new media – and repeatedly managing to choose the wrong options.
Twitter Comment
RT @jangles Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs  NevilleHobson.com [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs — NevilleHobson.com: dinosaur You might remember the huge kerfu.. [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
Worrying developments in the UK – “Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs”: [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@davefleet thanks for the tip about the NLA scheme. How do we stop this threat to accountable communicators everywhere? http://bit.ly/dPa5E
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine I understand the implications for PR and SM, but (I’m still too new to this!) how will this affect measurement?
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison it will dramatically increase the cost of content c ollection, if you’re measuring media of any sort.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine I told @craigecarroll this, but I would love to try to develop an efficient way to monitory SM sites like Twitter!
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison there are already about a dozen companies doing it radian6, social mention, scout labs. etc etc.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine We do some work with Radian6, and we have to do a lot of the leg work ourselves, it seems. It would be nice to have an easier fix.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison you can’t automate human intelligence that can figure out what to do with the data.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine True! It would be cool if we could apply something like Diction to SM, though!
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison even Diction isn’t as accurate as human analysis. at least that’s what we’re finding
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine So would development of a similar program for SM be worthwhile? Darn! I thought it was such a novel idea…
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison why wouldn’t you just use diction on social media?
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine That’s what I said, but @craigecarroll said it could work with most social media, but not Twitter.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@kdpaine Of course! Do you also foresee the cost of measurement increasing due to the growing influence of social media?
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@RebeccaDenison not really, social media is relatively inexpensive to monitor + so many cos are doing it, prices will stay low
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
RT @davefleet: Worrying developments in the UK – “Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs”: [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
RT @davefleet: Worrying developments in the UK – “Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs”: http://bit.ly/qow73 (via @kdpaine)
Twitter Comment
RT @davefleet: Worrying developments in the UK – “Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs”: [link to post] (via @kdpaine)
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@davefleet so pay per click is coming back in the UK? Why don’t we bring back dial-up and complete the retro tip. [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs — NevilleHobson.com [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
“…a scale of charges for anyone … who uses a link on their own website to any mainstream media content elsewhere” http://bit.ly/2vtFm
Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs: You might remember the huge kerfuffle last summer about the As.. http://tinyurl.com/ntz3sc
this is the free market system doing what it can to extract what it can
their success in implementing and policing is greatly suspect since most would involve micropayments. And unless there is an automated data capture and enforcement mechanism – it will be cost prohibitive
also who is to stop people from simply migrating to other data sources?
or simply having someone put out their own reworded version under a creative common license
how about charging people to email?
tempest in a tea pot
Twitter Comment
More. RT @jangles Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs: [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
NLA in UK wants to charge for links to "mainstream media" content. HUGE step back! http://bit.ly/qow73 (via @davefleet)
Twitter Comment
@zoe9 I know you’re on walkabout…check this out when back from Afr. This will have major impact on SMM in UK: [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
@zoe9 I know you’re on walkabout…check this out when back from Afr. This will have major impact on SMM in UK: http://bit.ly/3x4BZe
Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs ̢ NevilleHobson Рhttp://is.gd/1yyCI
[…] month, I wrote about plans by the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) here in the UK to introduce a scale of charges […]
[…] http://nevillehobson.com/2009/07/11/back-to-the-dark-ages-with-pay-per-click-for-prs/ […]
RT @jangles Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs  NevilleHobson.com http://bit.ly/qow73
Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs — NevilleHobson.com http://ff.im/-bivqK
RT @PRBristolblog: Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs — NevilleHobson.com http://ff.im/-bivqK
RT @mynewfringe: Back to the dark ages with pay per click for PRs — NevilleHobson.com http://ff.im/-bivqK