PaidContent UK reports some of the details of a Harris Interactive survey they commissioned which asked what people will do if their favourite online free source of news started charging for access to that content.
The results surely won’t surprise anyone: 74% of those surveyed said they’d find another free source of news online.
Put it another way – just 5% of those surveyed said they’d be willing to pay for access to that content.
Food for thought for those mainstream media companies contemplating putting some or all of their content behind the pay firewall:
[…] “This does not look like good news for a pay model in a competitive environment,†says Andrew Freeman, Harris’ senior media research consultant. “As long as free alternatives exist, consumers will turn to them for their daily news information, meaning heavy losses in terms of audience figures for those that charge. It remains to be seen whether the news industry will take the leap and begin charging for that which has been free for so long.â€
There’s another angle to this, though. I don’t think it’s only about free versus paid at all: it’s far more greyscale than black-and-white.
Isn’t it about how you as a consumer perceive the value of the content and related aspects, eg, who the creator of that content is?
If you think it’s compelling enough, you’d be willing to pay for it, wouldn’t you? Maybe even for the news. And what about the micropayment idea rather than a blanket cost? I like that idea a lot although more findings from the PaidContent UK/Harris Interactive survey shows my view as the minority one.
I wonder who’ll be first to figure out a model that works, presents a viable business opportunity and that consumers actually like.
Related posts:
13 responses to “Finding a viable pay-for-content model”
Hobson: Finding a viable pay-for-content model: PaidContent UK reports some of the details of a Harris In.. http://bit.ly/zOqKy
Twitter Comment
Finding a viable pay-for-content model Harris Interactive survey — NevilleHobson.com [link to post] (RT @jangles
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
RT @hemartin: Finding a viable pay-for-content model Harris Interactive survey — [link to post] (RT @jangles) 5% accept #paidcontent
– Posted using Chat Catcher
[Blog] Finding a viable pay-for-content model http://tinyurl.com/km6942 #fb
Finding a viable pay-for-content model Harris Interactive survey — NevilleHobson.com http://bit.ly/452KWp (RT @jangles
Hobson: Finding a viable pay-for-content model: PaidContent UK reports some of the details of a Harris In.. http://bit.ly/zOqKy
RT @hemartin: Finding a viable pay-for-content model Harris Interactive survey — http://bit.ly/452KWp (RT @jangles) 5% accept #paidcontent
Harris Survey: How people respond when favorite free source of online news starts charging (@jangles) http://bit.ly/SnEtv
RT @jangles Finding a viable pay-for-content model — NevilleHobson.com http://bit.ly/452KWp
[…] big appeal clearly is that it’s free. Yet as more mainstream media continue trying to figure out what media business models will work in the future, the idea of ‘all content is free’ is a finite one, even with a commodity such as news. So […]
[…] Finding a viable pay-for-content model […]
[…] scarcity, where none technically exists. Hulu, the FT, Wall Street Journal, The Economist and Twitter are all seeking remuneration models. So what does this mean for those who make and sell products to […]
[…] Finding a viable pay-for-content model […]