I watched an interview at lunchtime today on the BBC News channel where Roger Carr, chairman of Cadbury, was being asked a number of questions concerning his company’s position as it confronts a hostile takeover bid by Kraft Foods.
Towards the conclusion of the interview, Carr said something most interesting in response to a question by interviewer Simon Jack about expected synergies if Kraft succeeds:
Synergies is a euphemism for heavy cost cuts.
That’s probably what anyone who’s been through synergies following an acquisition has experienced, whether hostile or otherwise.
I certainly have, in a previous life. And I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve used the word ‘synergies’ when writing press releases and executing other communication to suggest the positiveness of a new combination and the great things that are expected as a result and especially because of synergies, with nary a glimmer of anything to suggest a different reality.
That reality nearly always does involve cuts, not only financial but also people. I don’t think you should be surprised at such an eventuality when two or more firms comes together. I just wish there were greater corporate honesty about what to really expect.
Whether or not Kraft succeeds, and whether or not their doing so may result in ‘synergies,’ I applaud Mr Carr’s honesty. I hope his shareholders and employees appreciate it.
5 responses to “The truth about synergies”
[Blog] The truth about synergies http://tinyurl.com/y9hpq4k #fb #in
Hobson: The truth about synergies:
I watched an interview at lunchtime today on the BBC News channel where Roger… http://bit.ly/7uArbw
Too true.it’s just the same when companies talk about high-grading;it’s time to polish up the resume.
The truth about synergies http://bit.ly/4Mx07e
[…] The truth about synergies […]